Case 3305275/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Cadogan King Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305275/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms Laurence-Doig, Mr Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting remotely by CVP at Watford on 29 April 2021, was constituted by Employment Judge de Silva QC with Ms Laurence-Doig and Mr Allen as members. The unanimous decision recorded that the Respondent failed to notify employee liability information, engaging regulation 11 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.
The Claimant’s TUPE claim was therefore found well-founded. The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £500 in respect of that failure pursuant to regulation 12(3) and (5) of TUPE. No other claims or remedies were recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found a failure to notify employee liability information under regulation 11 of TUPE and awarded £500 under regulation 12(3) and (5). | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £500
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 11 TUPE
- regulation 12(3) and (5) TUPE
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.