Case 3305278/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Memory Dzikiti v Dravens Healthcare Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305278/2024
- Decision date
- 9 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bartlett Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Memory Dzikiti
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mrs Memory Dzikiti’s automatic unfair dismissal claim under s99 Employment Rights Act succeeded. It awarded her £11,275.08 as compensation for unfair dismissal.
The tribunal also held that her pregnancy and maternity discrimination claim under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 succeeded in part. It awarded £14,400.00 for injury to feelings. The written decision records only the outcome and remedy, with no further breakdown of the equality award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal under s99 Employment Rights Act succeeded. | Upheld | — | £11,275 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Section 18 Equality Act 2010 claim succeeded in part; the published record records an award for injury to feelings. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | £14,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,675
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £11,275
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s99 Employment Rights Act
- section 18 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.