Case 3305283/2020 · Employment Tribunal
MR R JAGPAL v GH London Ground Handling Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305283/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR R JAGPAL
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Jagpal brought a single claim for unfair dismissal against GH London Ground Handling Services Limited. At a remote hearing on 20 April 2021, Employment Judge Skehan sat alone and recorded that the hearing had not been objected to by the parties.
The tribunal struck out and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because it did not have jurisdiction to hear it. The claim was not presented before the end of the limitation period under s.111, as extended by s.207B, of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and the tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim within time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented before the end of the limitation period in s.111, as extended by s.207B, ERA 1996, and that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to present it in time. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.111 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.