Case 3305312/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K. Lamb v Roche Products Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305312/2020
- Decision date
- 1 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr K. Lamb
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the telephone hearing on 31 March 2021, before Employment Judge McNeill QC, the claimant withdrew his claim for unlawful discrimination because of gender reassignment. The tribunal recorded that withdrawal and dismissed that claim on withdrawal.
The tribunal also dismissed further claims for breach of health and safety legislation, personal injury, breach of directors’ obligations, and breach of data protection laws. Those claims were dismissed on the basis that the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine them.
The judgment notes that other claims raised by the claimant, described as unlawful direct discrimination, victimisation, and detriment on the grounds of making alleged public interest disclosures, were to proceed to a full hearing, as set out in the case summary and orders of the same date. Those claims were not decided in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender reassignment discrimination | Claimant withdrew this claim; the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal. | Dismissed | Gender reassignment | — |
| Other | Claims for breach of health and safety legislation, personal injury, breach of directors’ obligations, and breach of data protection laws were dismissed because the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine them. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.