Case 3305313/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Lyubenova v H.P. Jung (Beaconsfield) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3305313/2020
- Decision date
- 21 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Lyubenova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Miss N Lyubenova v H.P. Jung (Beaconsfield) Limited. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It recorded that the claimant was entitled to 14 days' pay at a gross daily rate of £155.38, giving a gross entitlement of £2,175.32, or £1,846.04 net.
The judgment states that the claimant received £500 net, which the tribunal described as 27% of her entitlement. On that basis, the tribunal calculated that the respondent owed the remaining 73% of the gross entitlement, which came to £1,587.99. It ordered the respondent to pay that gross sum, less any appropriate and lawful PAYE deductions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,587.99, subject to lawful PAYE deductions if any. | Upheld | — | £1,588 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,588
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.