Case 3305317/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Fudge v Vinyl Presents Limited John Atherton Juno Digital Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305317/2024
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Fudge
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Fudge, brought a TUPE complaint described as a failure to inform and consult pursuant to Regulation 15 and contrary to Regulations 13 and 14 of the TUPE Regulations 2006. The judgment records that this complaint was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant, so there was no substantive determination of the merits of that claim in this decision.
The judgment also records that Juno Digital Limited was removed from the proceedings under Rule 35 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024, following an application by the claimant and with the agreement of the respondents. The remaining claims were stated to be unaffected by this judgment and to proceed against Vinyl Presents Limited and John Atherton.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The claimant’s complaint of failure to inform and consult under Regulation 15 and contrary to Regulations 13 and 14 of the TUPE Regulations 2006 was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.