Case 3305320/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Patel v Blue Apple Catering Holdings Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305320/2020
- Decision date
- 13 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Dated
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Patel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment in the claim of Mr R Patel against Blue Apple Catering Holdings Limited and Blue Apple Contract Catering Limited. The tribunal had previously made orders at a hearing on 6 October 2021, sent to the parties on 13 October 2021, giving the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out on the basis that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, or had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing. In those circumstances, the tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. It records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make written representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.