Case 3305326/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M. Caldecourt v Climate Engineering Solutions Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305326/2021
- Decision date
- 28 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M. Caldecourt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bury St. Edmunds by CVP on 10 and 11 October 2022 before Tribunal Judge Peer, acting as an Employment Judge. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The written record states that reasons for the decision were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's unlawful deductions from wages claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. No further findings are set out in the written judgment on that part of the case.
The claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £1,076.00 and a compensatory award of £7,846.15, producing a total award of £8,922.15.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant's unlawful deductions from wages claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered payment of a basic award of £1,076.00 and a compensatory award of £7,846.15, making a total of £8,922.15. | Upheld | — | £8,922 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,922
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,076
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,846
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.