Case 3305349/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L May v London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305349/2023
- Decision date
- 30 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge George Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L May
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing at Reading on 18 March 2025 before Employment Judge George. The respondent, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, applied for orders striking out particular complaints under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedural Rules 2024.
The tribunal dismissed that application. The written record provided here records the outcome only and does not set out substantive reasons for the dismissal, because reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not provided in the record supplied.
No substantive liability findings or remedy award are recorded in this decision text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's application for orders striking out particular complaints under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedural Rules 2024 was dismissed. The written record gives no substantive determination of the underlying complaints. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38 Employment Tribunal Procedural Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.