Case 3305353/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Taylor v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305353/2023
- Decision date
- 20 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss S Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal upheld a complaint that the first respondent failed to comply with its consultation obligations under s188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, finding that the premises at Bee House, Abingdon constituted an establishment and that no recognised trade union or appointed or elected employee representatives existed for the purposes of s188(1B). A protective award was made in favour of the claimant for the protected period of 90 days (12.86 weeks) beginning on 28 March 2023, valued at GBP 8,181.21.
The Tribunal further found the complaints of breach of contract in respect of notice pay, unauthorised deductions from wages for 1 to 28 March 2023, and holiday pay under regulations 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998 to be well-founded, ordering payments of GBP 3,147.66 (6 weeks' net notice pay), GBP 2,538.48 (gross unpaid wages) and GBP 888.47 (1.4 weeks' holiday pay) respectively. Under s163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the claimant was determined to be entitled to a redundancy payment of 3,119.58 (currency symbol not printed in the judgment text).
The Tribunal directed that credit is to be given for any sums paid by the Redundancy Payments Service against the above figures. The judgment was approved by Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst and dated 20 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under s188 TULR(C)A 1992 for failure to comply with collective consultation requirements; 90 days (12.86 weeks) from 28 March 2023. | Upheld | — | £8,181 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay; damages equivalent to 6 weeks' pay calculated using net pay. | Upheld | — | £3,148 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in the period 1 to 28 March 2023; gross sum, claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £2,538 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay in accordance with regulations 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998; 1.4 weeks. | Upheld | — | £888 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment determined under s163 Employment Rights Act 1996. Judgment text shows the figure as '3,119.58' (currency symbol omitted in source). | Upheld | — | £3,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,875
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s188(1B) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- s163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.