Case 3305357/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Om Raj Gurung v Specialised Recruitment Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305357/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Om Raj Gurung
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response by the expiry of the response period on 23 April 2024 and did not attend the hearing on 13 February 2025. Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto decided the case on the available material.
The tribunal found that Specialised Recruitment Services Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and had further failed to pay holiday pay for leave not taken. It ordered the respondent to pay £207.38 in respect of that finding. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of a further £25.10.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment links the unauthorised deduction finding with unpaid holiday pay for leave not taken in the same paragraph; the award was not separately broken down. | Upheld | — | £207 |
| Holiday pay | Award for failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £25 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £232
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.