Case 3305359/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Isobel Rogers v Marlow Education Trust RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305359/2024
- Decision date
- 22 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchings
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Isobel Rogers
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a private preliminary hearing by CVP on 22 May 2025, Employment Judge Hutchings dismissed the complaint of disability discrimination by association.
The judgment states that the claimant confirmed several times that, in her disability discrimination claims concerning alleged conduct against her, she was relying on her own disability and not her daughter's disabilities. The judge concluded that the alleged behaviour against the claimant was not related to her daughter's disabilities. The claimant's remaining claim(s) were listed to proceed to hearing in April 2027.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The preliminary hearing judgment dismissed only the complaint of disability discrimination by association. The claimant's remaining claim(s) were listed to proceed to a future hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.