Case 3305376/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Shvets v Support Unlimited UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305376/2020
- Decision date
- 8 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Shvets
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mrs A Shvets's claim against Support Unlimited UK Limited because it had not been actively pursued. In a letter dated 8 May 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out, referring to her failure to comply with the tribunal's order dated 12 March 2021, including paragraphs 2.1 and 2.5, and to the fact that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Allen ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment records no determination on the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not comply with the tribunal's order dated 12 March 2021 and did not make representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the tribunal's letter dated 8 May 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.