Case 3305378/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hussain v Pisu limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305378/2022
- Decision date
- 23 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 8 May 2025, the Tribunal gave Mr M Hussain an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the pleaded issues and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s). By letter dated 8 May 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued, or to request a hearing. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.