Case 3305384/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Ms Inga Rudzate v Grove WP Ltd — 2023

Case reference: 3305384/2022
Decision date: 8 November 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
Venue: Reading

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Ms Inga Rudzate

Respondent

Grove WP Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

On 24 October 2023 Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto struck out the claimant's complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages, unfair dismissal because of a protected disclosure, and detriment because of a protected disclosure. The judgment states that those claims were struck out under Rule 37 because they had no reasonable prospect of success.

The written record records no substantive liability findings on those complaints and no remedy award. It also states that the remaining complaints would proceed to a final hearing.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages struck out pursuant to Rule 37 on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.	Struck out	—	—
Unfair dismissal	Complaint of unfair dismissal said to be because of a protected disclosure struck out pursuant to Rule 37 on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.	Struck out	—	—
Whistleblowing	Complaint of detriment because of a protected disclosure struck out pursuant to Rule 37 on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.