Case 3305388/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Ghafoori v Skins Laser Clinic Ltd and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305388/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss S Ghafoori
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 Employment Tribunal judgment. The judgment records that the claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunals on 17 May 2022, that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and that the Employment Judge decided a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The written judgment states that the claim succeeds. It does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action, and it does not set out any substantive findings of fact or law beyond the Rule 21 procedural basis for entering judgment. The amount of remedy was not determined in the judgment; the Tribunal said the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action. It records a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and says the remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.