Case 3305397/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S C Norman v Patol Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305397/2022
- Decision date
- 2 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S C Norman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 17 September 2022, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 23 July 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying unfair dismissal complaint, and it does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant did not make written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 17 September 2022. The reasons stated that she had not complied with the order dated 23 July 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.