Case 3305412/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Olivia Farris v Fresh Foods Maystor Ltd (In creditor’s voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305412/2024
- Decision date
- 8 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss Olivia Farris
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded in the absence of both respondents. The First Respondent was in creditors' voluntary liquidation and was not expected to attend; the Second Respondent was also not expected to attend.
The claimant had been employed by Waugh Inns Ltd from 19 December 2022 and TUPE transferred to the First Respondent on 10 November 2023. She was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 7 May 2024, with one year's service. The tribunal found she had not been paid for 22-28 April 2024 and awarded £208.40 gross for unauthorised deductions from wages.
The tribunal found the claimant's holiday year ran from 1 January to 31 December and that she had accrued 2.7 weeks' holiday by 7 May 2024, with no holiday taken. It awarded £562.68 gross for unpaid holiday entitlement. The claims for unfair dismissal and a protective award were dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The First Respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions for unpaid wages for 22-28 April 2024. | Upheld | — | £208 |
| Holiday pay | The First Respondent was found to have failed to pay accrued holiday entitlement of 2.7 weeks. | Upheld | — | £563 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states the claim for a protective award was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £771
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.