Case 3305414/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Gordon v AJC Easy Cabin — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305414/2025
- Decision date
- 10 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Approved
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Gordon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the only respondent proceeding was AJC Easy Cabin and that the claim form and attachments alleged unfair dismissal. It noted possible issues about the effective date of termination and limitation, but did not make further enquiries because the claim was struck out on another basis.
The tribunal found that the claim form implied less than two years' employment and that the claimant had not argued he had two years' service or that an exception applied after being invited to comment. It also considered the word "harassment" in the claim form, but decided that no separate Equality Act harassment complaint had been presented because the alleged unwanted conduct was not said to be related to a protected characteristic.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal stated this was the only complaint presented and struck it out because there was no reasonable prospect of the claimant demonstrating the requirements of section 108 ERA. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.