Case 3305427/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms G Giadom v Northwest Associates Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3305427/2024
- Decision date
- 22 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms G Giadom
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Giadom was employed by Northwest Associates Limited from 27 September 2021 until 29 February 2024. The tribunal found that the reason for her dismissal was redundancy and that she was unfairly dismissed on 29 February 2024. It found that, had a fair consultation taken place, there was a 100% chance that she would have been dismissed at the end of that process. A fair consultation beginning on 29 February 2024 could have concluded by 7 March 2024.
The tribunal awarded £1,015.92 in total. This comprised a basic award of £183.66, calculated as three weeks’ gross pay less £670.83 already purportedly paid as statutory redundancy pay; a compensatory award of £262.60 for one week’s net pay, including pension loss; and £569.66 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, representing two weeks’ gross pay. No award was made for loss of statutory rights and no ACAS uplift was awarded. The prescribed element for recoupment purposes was £262.60, attributable to 1 March to 7 March 2024.
To the extent that complaints alleging breach of contract or holiday pay were presented, they were dismissed on withdrawal. The tribunal recorded that the only substantive complaint was unfair dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,016 |
| Breach of contract | To the extent that a breach of contract complaint was presented, it was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | To the extent that a holiday pay complaint was presented, it was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,016
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £184
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £263
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.