Case 3305429/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Mancini v Claxton Engineering Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305429/2022
- Decision date
- 31 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Mancini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr J Mancini’s unfair dismissal claim against Claxton Engineering Limited. It found that the claimant had continued to fail to comply with Tribunal orders dated 30 June 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The reasons record that the claimant did not make written representations, or any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not be ordered, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment states that the hearing listed for 9 February 2023 would not take place. No merits finding or monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was struck out because the claimant continued not to comply with Tribunal orders dated 30 June 2022 and had not actively pursued the claim. The judgment also states that the claimant failed to make written representations, or sufficient representations, as to why strike out should not be ordered or to request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.