Case 3305452/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alan Gilmour v Neil Hadris (Owner, NH Transport Services – Sole Trader — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305452/2022
- Decision date
- 19 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cotton Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alan Gilmour
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Alan Gilmour worked for the respondent as a driver from 17 May 2021 to 12 April 2022. The respondent did not attend or file a response. At the hearing the claimant withdrew his unfair dismissal claim and his claim for alleged unauthorised deductions in respect of holiday pay and pension contributions, saying he did not have the necessary two years' continuous service for unfair dismissal.
The tribunal found that the claimant was paid monthly in arrears and that his net salary was £1,785.60. It accepted that he was dismissed on 12 April 2022, but found that he was not paid his April 2022 wages. On the evidence, including bank statements and WhatsApp messages, the tribunal concluded that the amount properly payable was the net sum of £988.80 for 1 to 19 April 2022: the claimant had worked until 12 April 2022 and was entitled to at least one week's notice under s.86(1)(a) ERA 1996. The tribunal rejected the claimant's argument that he was entitled to be paid until 29 April 2022 because the WhatsApp exchange was too ambiguous to establish such an agreement.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide written particulars of employment, in breach of s.1 ERA 1996. It therefore increased the claimant's award by £824 under s.38(3) Employment Act 2002, being the equivalent of two weeks' net pay. The judgment records total awards of £988.80 for the unpaid wages and £824 for the written particulars breach, making £1,812.80 in all.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid April 2022 wages. Tribunal found the claimant was entitled to net pay of £988.80 for 1 to 19 April 2022 and that this sum was not paid. | Upheld | — | £989 |
| Other | Failure to provide written particulars of employment / written statement of initial particulars. Tribunal found a breach of s.1 ERA 1996 and increased the award by two weeks' net pay under s.38(3) Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £824 |
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn at the hearing; claimant said he did not have the necessary two years' continuous service. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for alleged unauthorised deductions in respect of holiday pay and pension contributions, withdrawn at the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,813
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 13 ERA 1996
- properly payable under section 13(3) ERA 1996
- section 86(1)(a) ERA 1996
- section 1 ERA 1996
- section 38(3) Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.