Case 3305457/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Alice French v Fresh Foods Maystor Ltd (In creditor’s voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305457/2024
- Decision date
- 9 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss Alice French
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by Waugh Inns Ltd from 19 August 2021 and TUPE transferred to the First Respondent on 12 February 2024. She was summarily dismissed by reason of redundancy on 7 May 2024, with two years' service. The tribunal proceeded in the absence of both respondents, noting that the First Respondent was in creditors' voluntary liquidation and neither respondent was expected to attend.
The tribunal found that the First Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 22 April to 7 May 2024, awarding £653.43 gross subject to credit for £331.24 already paid by the Second Respondent. It also found that the claimant was entitled to two weeks' notice, that one week had been paid by the Second Respondent, and that the First Respondent was in breach of contract for failing to pay the remaining week.
The tribunal awarded holiday pay based on 1.3 weeks of accrued untaken holiday and found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment calculated as two weeks at £508.22. The claims for unfair dismissal and a protective award were dismissed upon withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant is to give credit for £331.24 paid by the Second Respondent. | Upheld | — | £653 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for one week's unpaid notice. | Upheld | — | £508 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had accrued 1.3 weeks' untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £661 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,016 |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The protective award claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 67 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.