Case 3305458/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Alexandra Scarfe, Solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305458/2020
- Decision date
- 9 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dobbie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on 4 March 2021, Employment Judge Dobbie considered the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claim on the basis that it was out of time. The claimant said her employment ended on 14 or 15 February 2020 after she resigned on 15 January 2020, and that she had started Acas Early Conciliation on 9 February 2020 with the certificate issued on 10 February 2020.
The claimant gave evidence that she had sought advice from Unison before resigning, that she had been told the union would handle the claim, and that she had sent a handwritten claim form by registered post on 17 February 2020. She said she continued to chase the union for updates and later learned that a claim form had been received by Leicester Employment Tribunal on 21 February 2020. The judge also noted that the typed claim form presented on 11 June 2020 could not be treated as the only claim form because it was materially different from the handwritten February form, although both raised constructive unfair dismissal.
After making enquiries with Leicester Tribunal, the judge concluded that the handwritten form received on 21 February 2020 was the correct claim form in the proceedings. The judge decided not to strike out the June 2020 form and instead placed the February 2020 form on the file. Because that form had been presented well within time, the respondent's application to strike out was refused. The judgment records no merits determination and no financial award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Respondent's application to strike out the claim as out of time was refused. The underlying constructive unfair dismissal claim was not determined on the merits; the February 2020 handwritten claim form was treated as the correct claim form and found to be in time. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- presented within a reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.