Case 3305493/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Walker v Everest Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305493/2020
- Decision date
- 19 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Everest Limited was in administration and that neither the Administrator's consent nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. It also noted that the claimant had been given an opportunity on 19 November 2021 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No merits determination or monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action. It states that the claim was struck out because the respondent was in administration, no consent of the Administrator or permission of the court had been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986, and the claimant did not give an acceptable reason for not actively pursuing the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.