Case 3305497/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Xyz — 2020
- Case reference
- 3305497/2018
- Decision date
- 14 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Members
- Venue
- Huntingdon
- Panel members
- Mr P Devonald, Mrs CA Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Huntingdon on 9 and 10 January 2020, an Employment Tribunal consisting of Employment Judge Ord, Mr P Devonald and Mrs CA Smith heard the case. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal also made an anonymity order of its own motion under rule 50(3)(d).
The written judgment records only that the claimant's complaints were not well founded. The claim was dismissed. The extracted text does not set out any separate factual findings, legal analysis, or remedy, and it notes that written reasons would not be provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant's complaints were not well founded and the claim was dismissed. The public listing identifies the case as sex discrimination; the extracted judgment text itself does not specify the pleaded allegations in further detail. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.