Case 3305515/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Smith v National Highways Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305515/2024
- Decision date
- 19 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 27 May 2025, the tribunal gave Miss M Smith an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant responded and referred the tribunal to earlier emails dated 26 March 2025 and 1 April 2025.
In the 1 April 2025 email, the claimant said that she had eventually got her money back after months of escalating and that she would rather have nothing to do with National Highways going forward. On that basis, the tribunal found that the claim was no longer being actively pursued and struck it out. The judgment records no merits determination and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment only states that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued. This head is taken from the case context/listing category rather than from the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment only states that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued. This head is taken from the case context/listing category rather than from the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.