Case 3305519/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D. Stirling v Ayesha Siddiqa Girls School — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305519/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D. Stirling
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge McNeill QC heard the case at Watford by CVP on 16 March 2021. The judgment records that, without admission of liability, the respondent agreed to pay Miss D. Stirling £7.50 claimed for arrears of wages, and the tribunal ordered payment of that sum on or before 30 March 2021.
The judgment also states that the claimant's remaining claims were claims over which the tribunal had no jurisdiction and were therefore dismissed. The written record does not identify those remaining claims further and does not set out any separate legal test or additional remedy beyond the £7.50 payment order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent agreed without admission of liability to pay the £7.50 claimed in respect of arrears of wages, and the tribunal ordered payment of that sum by 30 March 2021. | Settled | — | £8 |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's remaining claims were claims over which the tribunal had no jurisdiction and were therefore dismissed; it does not identify those claims individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.