Case 3305556/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sabir (family member) For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305556/2023
- Decision date
- 14 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King Members
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mrs Brown, Mrs Betts
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Sabir (family member) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Reading Employment Tribunal conducted via CVP on 29 April 2024 to 1 May 2024, Employment Judge King sat with Mrs Brown and Mrs Betts. The written judgment records that Mr F Kashif’s claims against BP Express Shopping Ltd for direct disability discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, discrimination arising from disability under section 15, and failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 were not well founded and were dismissed.
The extracted written record does not set out the tribunal’s oral reasoning, but it does record that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed; the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed; the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed; the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s13 Equality Act 2010
- s15 Equality Act 2010
- s20/21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.