Case 3305581/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Janoy Mathew v Sark Service Station (Jet) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305581/2020
- Decision date
- 5 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Representation
- Venue
- Watford Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Janoy Mathew
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Janoy Mathew had been unfairly dismissed in breach of section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It awarded a basic award of £2,123.82 and a compensatory award made up of £2,012.02 for loss of earnings equivalent to the notice period, £350.00 for loss of statutory rights, and a 5% ACAS uplift of £118.10, giving total compensation for unfair dismissal of £4,603.94.
The claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of his notice period, described in the judgment as his wrongful dismissal claim, failed. The tribunal also upheld the claimant's claim for pay equivalent to accrued and outstanding annual leave entitlement under regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, awarding £1,707.68 for 26 days at 8 hours per day at £8.21 per hour. The respondent was ordered to pay £6,311.62 in total, described as compensation for unfair dismissal and shortfall in pay for annual leave.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed in breach of s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £4,604 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claimant's breach of contract claim in respect of his notice period failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant succeeded in his claim for pay equivalent to accrued and outstanding annual leave entitlement under regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £1,708 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,312
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,124
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,480
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.