Case 3305597/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Cameron v Wilko Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305597/2023
- Decision date
- 5 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Cameron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that WILKO LIMITED was in administration and that neither the Administrator's consent nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to continue, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. On that basis, the claim could not proceed.
The Tribunal also noted that on 29 July 2024 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal struck out the claim because the respondent was in administration and neither the consent of the Administrator nor permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to continue under the Insolvency Act 1986. The claimant was also given an opportunity on 29 July 2024 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued, but did not give an acceptable reason. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.