Case 3305602/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Nwaka v Dr Hayat Sindi & Others — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305602/2020
- Decision date
- 26 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Nwaka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in case no. 3305602/2020. Employment Judge Ord found that Mr S Nwaka had been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of race, as alleged in the claim form submitted on 16 June 2020. The tribunal also found that he had been dismissed in breach of his contract of employment.
The judgment did not determine remedy. It directed that a hearing on remedy would take place at Cambridge County Court, 197 East Road, Cambridge, on 11 March 2021 at 12:00 midday. For that hearing, the claimant was ordered to file and serve a schedule of financial losses, supporting documents, a statement of the facts and discriminatory acts relied on for injury to feelings, witness statements, and any medical evidence relied on for injury to feelings by the stated dates.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal stated that the claimant had been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of race as alleged in the claim form. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal stated that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of his contract of employment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.