Case 3305614/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Ryan v Gerard Hughes — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305614/2020
- Decision date
- 24 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Welch
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Ryan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E Ryan brought a claim against Gerard Hughes for unlawful deductions from pay. The case was heard at Bury St Edmunds via CVP on 24 August 2021 before Employment Judge K Welch sitting alone. The respondent did not attend.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deductions from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £383.36. The judgment records this sum as being in respect of unlawful deductions from pay for the period 1 December 2019 to 20 March 2019, which is the date range stated in the decision.
No separate breakdown of remedy was given beyond the gross award, and the judgment does not record any additional statutory or common law tests, nor any panel members because the case was heard by the Employment Judge sitting alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of a gross sum of £383.36 in respect of unlawful deductions from pay. The judgment states the period as 1 December 2019 to 20 March 2019, which appears inconsistent as written. | Upheld | — | £383 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £383
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.