Case 3305631/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Laurene Armer v Gravitilab Aerospace Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305631/2024
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Laurene Armer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld four heads of claim brought by Miss Laurene Armer against Gravitilab Aerospace Ltd. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £2,916.67, subject to tax and National Insurance. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £269.23, subject to tax and National Insurance.
On dismissal-related claims, the tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice pay and awarded damages of £2,692.31, subject to tax and National Insurance. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £1,929.00.
The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £7,807.21 in total, subject to tax and National Insurance. No separate findings on unfair dismissal, discrimination, or other statutory claims appear in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £2,917 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £269 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice pay and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £2,692 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,929 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,807
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.