Case 3305633/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Aaron McNeill v Gravitilab Aerospace Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305633/2024
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Aaron McNeill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,333.33, and that it had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, ordering payment of £923.08. Both sums were stated to be subject to tax and National Insurance.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice pay, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £3,076.92. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,572.00.
The judgment records a total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant of £9,905.33 (subject to tax and National Insurance where applicable). The judgment was given by Employment Judge Alliott and dated 11 November 2024.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages; award stated as £3,333.33 subject to tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £3,333 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement; award stated as £923.08 subject to tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £923 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice pay; damages of £3,076.92 subject to tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £3,077 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,572.00. | Upheld | — | £2,572 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,905
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,572
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.