Case 3305643/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Curtis Reed v Gravitilab Aerospace Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305643/2024
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Curtis Reed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and had failed to pay his holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £2,333.33 for wages and £269.23 for holiday pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice pay and awarded £2,153.85 in damages. In addition, it found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,076.92.
The total sum ordered was £5,833.33, with the judgment stating that the wages, holiday pay and notice pay elements were subject to tax and National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,333 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to unpaid holiday entitlement rather than citing the Working Time Regulations expressly. | Upheld | — | £269 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,154 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,077 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,833
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.