Case 3305665/2024 · Employment Tribunal
A Alesmail v Leonard Buca Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305665/2024
- Decision date
- 31 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Alesmail
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, A Alesmail, brought a claim against Leonard Buca Ltd in the South East Employment Tribunal. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
On the redundancy payment issue, the tribunal held that the claimant was not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment because he had been employed for less than two years. That claim therefore failed.
On the wages claim, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,150.00 gross.
The judgment records a total sum payable of £1,150.00. No separate award breakdown is given beyond the deduction-from-wages sum, and no interest or other heads of remedy are mentioned in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment because he had been employed for less than two years. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,150.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,150 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,150
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.