Case 3305678/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C J Kennell Webb v Hook 2 Sisters Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305678/2024
- Decision date
- 21 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C J Kennell Webb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing heard by CVP at Bury St Edmunds on 28 January 2025 before Employment Judge Laidler sitting alone. The claimant, Mr C J Kennell Webb, did not attend and was not represented. The respondent, Hook 2 Sisters Limited, was represented by Ms R Harmer, Solicitor.
The judgment states that, because the claimant failed to attend, the claim was dismissed in accordance with Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024. The decision is procedural and does not contain findings on the substantive merits of any unfair dismissal or disability discrimination allegations.
No remedy was awarded and no liability findings were made on the underlying dispute. The judgment was approved on 21 February 2025 and sent to the parties on 28 February 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Dismissed at a preliminary hearing under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 because the claimant failed to attend. The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.