Case 3305684/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Perrow v The Tipsy Vegan Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305684/2024
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge EJ
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Perrow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 6 June 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in breach of contract. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £335 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages in breach of contract and must pay a single gross sum of £335; it does not split the award by claim type. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the unauthorised deductions from wages were in breach of contract and awards a single gross sum of £335; it does not split the award by claim type. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £335
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.