Case 3305685/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Cardozo v Nafees Qureshi — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305685/2022
- Decision date
- 31 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Cardozo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 12 December 2022, the tribunal gave Mr Cardozo an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why his Disability Discrimination complaint should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order dated 22 October 2022. The tribunal recorded that he failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
The result was that the Disability Discrimination complaint was struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability on the discrimination complaint, and it does not award any monetary remedy.
The tribunal noted that the claimant's remaining claim or claims remained listed for hearing on 13 February 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out the complaint of Disability Discrimination after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 22 October 2022 and did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response to the letter dated 12 December 2022. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.