Case 3305694/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Shah v PORR UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305694/2022
- Decision date
- 17 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Shah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs A Shah's employment with PORR UK Ltd ended with effect from 6 April 2022. The tribunal found that the alleged contract said to have been breached was entered into no earlier than 7 April 2022, after the employment contract had already ended.
On that basis, Employment Judge Quill held that the complaint of breach of contract was not within the jurisdiction of the employment tribunal and dismissed it. The judgment also records that the claim as presented did not bring any other complaint, including any claim for payment during a notice period or arrears of pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that the claimant's employment contract ended with effect from 6 April 2022 and that the alleged contract said to have been breached was entered into no earlier than 7 April 2022. On that basis, the breach of contract complaint was not within the jurisdiction of the employment tribunal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.