Case 3305700/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C T Muchenagumbo v Ness M Care Services Ltd. — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305700/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C T Muchenagumbo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 15 May 2022 and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and made a determination on the material put before the tribunal. The tribunal found that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages in the gross sum of £1,716.02 and was also entitled to be paid £1,015.20 gross for accrued and untaken holiday. Judgment was therefore entered for the total gross sum of £2,731.22.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages in the gross sum of £1,716.02. | Upheld | — | £1,716 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to be paid for accrued and untaken holiday in the gross sum of £1,015.20. | Upheld | — | £1,015 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,731
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.