Case 3305702/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Norris v Newjohn Retailer (walton) Ltd and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305702/2022
- Decision date
- 3 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs J Norris
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21. The tribunal found that Mrs J Norris had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered the first respondent, Newjohn Retailer (Staines) Ltd, to pay damages of £4,500.72.
It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,750.00. In addition, the tribunal found that the first respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,319.08.
The total sum ordered was £12,569.80. No separate findings or awards are recorded in the judgment for any other heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for notice pay awarded on the basis that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £4,501 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £6,750 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the first respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,319 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,570
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.