Case 3305718/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Walker v Hydrozone Limited (in Liquidation) Full Merits Hearing — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305718/2022
- Decision date
- 5 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Boyes
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Walker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Walker's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages succeeded. The tribunal found that the deduction consisted of unpaid wages owed for the period 1 February 2022 to 13 February 2022. It ordered Hydrozone Limited (in Liquidation) to pay the gross sum of £714.43 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted.
The tribunal also dealt with the respondent's counterclaim for breach of contract. It held that it had no jurisdiction to deal with that counterclaim because the claimant had not made a breach of contract claim. The judgment was given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages was made in respect of unpaid wages owed for 1 February 2022 to 13 February 2022 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £714.43. | Upheld | — | £714 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to deal with the respondent's counterclaim for breach of contract because the claimant had not made a breach of contract claim. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £714
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.