Case 3305721/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Treppides v Doris Abigail — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305721/2022
- Decision date
- 20 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Treppides
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 16 May 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a response from the respondent. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Maxwell Date on 2 August 2022 and sent to the parties on 20 August 2022.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaint that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,770.69 gross in respect of that claim. The tribunal also upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £446. No separate findings on interest, injury to feelings, or other compensatory heads are recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,770.69 gross under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £1,771 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £446. | Upheld | — | £446 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,217
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.