Case 3305730/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Perlberg v The Charles Kalms, Henry Ronson Immanuel College — 2026
- Case reference
- 3305730/2024
- Decision date
- 11 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Perlberg
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Ms S Perlberg's claims against The Charles Kalms, Henry Ronson Immanuel College at Watford Employment Tribunal from 9 to 11 February 2026 before Employment Judge Arullendran. The written judgment records two adjudicated claims: wrongful dismissal and unfair dismissal.
The tribunal held that the claimant's wrongful dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it. It also held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was not well founded and dismissed it. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and does not include written reasons or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The written judgment records that the claim was not well founded and was dismissed; reasons were given orally and are not included in the written record supplied. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the claim was not well founded and was dismissed; reasons were given orally and are not included in the written record supplied. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.