Case 3305732/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z Dubuisson v Skins Clinic laser and 2 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305732/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss Z Dubuisson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunals on 17 May 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge R Lewis Date decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds. The remedy to which the claimant is entitled was not determined in this judgment and was left for a Remedy Hearing. The judgment was dated 23 June 2023 and sent to the parties on 27 June 2023.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds but does not separately identify or analyse this claim type; classification follows the listing categories provided in the prompt. | Upheld | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds but does not separately identify or analyse this claim type; classification follows the listing categories provided in the prompt. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds but does not separately identify or analyse this claim type; classification follows the listing categories provided in the prompt. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds but does not separately identify or analyse this claim type; classification follows the listing categories provided in the prompt. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds but does not separately identify or analyse this claim type; classification follows the listing categories provided in the prompt. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.