Case 3305752/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B YILDIRIM v Heyman AI Limited ‘in compulsory liquidation’ — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305752/2021
- Decision date
- 15 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B YILDIRIM
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 14 December 2023 the Tribunal gave Mr Yildirim an opportunity to provide written reasons within 14 days why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
The Tribunal recorded that Heyman AI Limited was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. The judgment therefore struck out the proceedings and makes no merits findings or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out before any merits determination. The reasons state that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and permission of the court had not been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out before any merits determination. The reasons state that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and permission of the court had not been obtained under the Insolvency Act 1986. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.