Case 3305772/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Joe v The Tipsy Vegan Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305772/2024
- Decision date
- 16 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Joe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Tipsy Vegan Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr J Joe's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay him the net sum of £439.78 without any deduction or set off.
The judgment also provided that if PAYE deductions were required in connection with the payment, those deductions had to be made in addition to the ordered amount so that the claimant would receive £439.78 net. No other claims, findings, or remedies are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £439.78 without deduction or set off. The judgment also states that any required PAYE deductions must be paid in addition to that amount so the claimant receives £439.78 net. | Upheld | — | £440 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £440
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £440
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.