Case 3305773/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Amjad Fayyaz v Morrison Data Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305773/2021
- Decision date
- 21 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Amjad Fayyaz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal allowed the claimant's application for reconsideration of the rejection of the unfair dismissal claim. It revoked the rejection and accepted the unfair dismissal claim.
The tribunal refused the application to strike out the claims for notice pay, holiday pay and unauthorised deductions from wages. It directed that all claims would proceed in accordance with case management orders made separately.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal allowed reconsideration of the rejection of the unfair dismissal claim, revoked the rejection, and accepted the claim. The merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal refused the application to strike out the notice pay claim. The merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal refused the application to strike out the holiday pay claim. The merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal refused the application to strike out the unauthorised deductions from wages claim. The merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.